Beauty, interrupted. At its best, pictured here, the Mangusta is a work of art. At its worse...well... Car and photo courtesy Daryl Addams.
Beauty, Interrupted
By Wallace Alfred Wyss
The DeTomaso Mangusta is one of the most beautiful cars ever to come out of Italy. But it does have its problems.
On paper, particularly when you consider that it made its debut in 1966, it seems like a magnificent achievement—it’s mid-engined, it’s low to the ground, it is low in height (42” high) , and is a very clean design.
Actually, and ironically, the body shape was penned by Giorgetto Giugiaro more as a whim—Ghia was doing the Iso Fidia four door sedan at the time and Ing. Bizzarrini, at the time working for Iso, thought it would be a good idea to have a sports car with some of the same design features for rich people to mark alongside their Fidia. Sort of a “his and hers” combo. So a mid-engined Iso was drawn up and a body shell built. But when it was shown to Renzo Rivolta, the owner of Iso, he rejected the idea outright (probably knowing that the only available transaxle would cost a bunch more than a transmission for a front engined car) and Ghia coachbuilders was stuck with a body design they didn’t know what to do with.
Enter the arch-villain/savior (he gets called a “villain” much more than “savior,” alas) Alejandro DeTomaso, an Argentinean building cars in Modena with his American wife, Isabelle Haskell. In the 1950s the dynamic duo were de facto OSCA employees, racing OSCAs and buying and selling them. But Alejandro wanted to go mid-engined, and the Maserati brothers, who owned OSCA, weren’t so convinced. They parted ways and DeTomaso and his American wife started their own firm in 1959 in a converted pig barn (there’s some symbolism there that escapes me…). (See note 1)In 1963, after making a number of mid-engined race cars, DeTomaso Automobili came out with a production four cylinder midi coupe called the Vallelunga, named after a racetrack where a prototype of theirs had encountered some success. Alejandro, it turned out, was crazy about the spine frame. He had seen it on a German prewar car, the Rumpler, and decided it was the way to go. The car was cute enough, sort of a baby Ferrari 250LM in styling, but not nearly fast enough with its slightly hotted-up British Cortina engine.
The first three were alloy-bodied by Fissore but the remaining 50 or so were fiberglass bodied by Ghia.Around 1965, DeTomaso had also been doing a project with race driver Carroll Shelby, a sort of Can Am car powered by a hyped up 289 V8 (which DeTomaso claimed produced 500 bhp, which would have been a surprise to Shelby, who had seen them grenade at 390 hp.!) But Shelby at some point yanked the funding on his part, because Ford wanted him to build more Daytona coupes for the Cobra racing program. So DeTomaso was left with a beautiful spine chassis but no money to develop it into a race car.
So there was DeTomaso, who had bought the aging Carrozzeria Ghia with his wife’s family’s funds, with a body that no one wanted. (See note 2)
Since the 70P car was defunded by Shelby, DeTomaso said he owned it. He thought about what to do with it and decided to mate the Guigiaro-designed street car body on the mid-engined 70P spine chassis developed from the Vallelunga. That became the Mangusta. He named it the “Mangusta” precisely to pique Shelby because, in nature, the natural enemy of the cobra snake is the mongoose, i.e. mangusta. Also now today the name of an Italian helicopter and a huge superyacht.
DeTomaso had only planned on the Mangusta being a promotion item for his shop, it even being called the Ghia 5000 in the lettering on the tail, but those customers with checkbooks in hand were not to be ignored. He started production of the Mangusta body shells, most likely on a chassis made elsewhere.
The license plate refers to the total number of Mangustas made, which , considering DeTomaso's sloppy record keeping, could be hundreds of cars off. The exhausts have quite a bark since they aren't very long. Photo by Daryl Addams.
Though DeTomaso was going full speed ahead on the Mangusta, there was a fly in the ointment—the car failed to meet a myriad of new design laws in the USA (headlamps too low, toggle switches on the dash, no crash protection, etc) but DeTomaso’s in-laws were what you call “connected” with American legislators. (We would say “in bed with” but don’t want to risk mis-interpretation through double entendres) DeTomaso squeaked the Mangusta through for U.S. sale by having it exempted as a low volume car, of which less than 500 would be made and only through 1969 in its original form. The idea was to sell the non-conforming cars and then update the model to meet the laws in 1970. And that’s what they did, the 1970 Mangustas having pop-up headlamps and rocker switches on the dash among other up-dates. (On the cars with two headlamps when the headlamps weren’t flipped upright, they looked odd, and droopy which is why some prefer the four headlamp cars. Giugiaro used a similar flip-up headlamp design on the prototype street Iso Grifo and later long-nose Iso Grifo production cars.) If you see an early Goose it usually bears a little silver ten cent stick-on label that says that it is exempted from a whole raft of U.S. regulations. They might have just as well stamped it “politically protected” or “We know someone in Washington D.C.”
The steering wheel was unique in that it used leather and then wood sections. Car and photo courtesy Daryl Addams.
You would expect a prototype to be test driven hundreds of thousands of miles while being developed. While DeTomaso did hire accomplished race driver Jonathan Williams to do some testing, it was probably under 3000 miles and likely little Williams said was to have any effect. The Mangustas were in essence, hand made, each car a little different.
Now comes in a wrinkle: a woulda, gooda, shoulda. The head designer at Ford, one sharp eyed martinet named Eugene Bordinat, took a fancy to the ‘Goose and ordered one. Ford even had it painted yellow and displayed at the New York Auto Show. If you were there, and inquired, you got a brochure advising you to make further inquiries of Mr. Carroll Shelby, yes, the same ex-chicken pluckin’ Texan that DeTomaso was making fun of (the auto biz makes for strange bedfellows….).
On the occasion of Ford showing a Mangusta at the NY Auto Show they handed out this poster, which was probably by George Bartell. It referred interested prospects to one Carroll Hall Shelby.
But when a Ford engineering and design team were sent to inspect the cars being made on the assembly line at Ghia they came back shaking their heads that such a modern looking car was in fact built crudely, along the order of Cobra bodies which Shelby always said “were knocked out by winos under a bridge.” The Ford minions raised DeTomaso’s hopes, then dashed them. But ironically, in the manner of a true salesman, DeTomaso collared the executives before they left and showed them five wooden scale models of a new car, the DeTomaso 351. This one, he explained, would be unitized. No more spine frame. Furthermore, it would be made on an assembly line, just like in Dearborn. No more hand made body panels, etc. Plus he had this assembly line in hand in another coachbuilder he had added to his portfolio, Vignale. They were a company with a rich and storied history, and had last been building the Maserati Indy.
Timing in the car business is everything. DeTomaso, a LeMans racing veteran, had observed the seduction of Henry Ford II, grandson of the first Henry Ford, into the world of Italian cars. Henry Ford II was in fact going through sort of an “Italian period” at the time. Even though the Ford GTs had vanquished the Ferraris at LeMans not once but several times, he still hankered for a Ford to be made in Italy. An exotic Ford, one that people would look at and think: “Is that the latest Ferrari?”
So it was that he had issued orders to his minions to come back from Italy with an Italian car. So even though not a single Pantera had been built, and there was no prototype to drive, they bought the Pantera before they left town.
Note 1
He bought Ghia from Leonidas Rhadamés, the young son of Rafael Trujillo, the dictator of the Dominican Republic. It is said that young Trujillo was in jail at the time so most amenable to any cash offers. You might think the son of a dictator would have some political clout but it is said a CIA-paid for bullet put that clout to an end in 1961.
Note 2
DeTomaso happened, by accident or design, to marry into a monied family bulging with entrepreneurial zeal. The wife’s father once started a horse racing track, Monmouth Park and was a GM VP. They got married in Palm Beach, always a sign that you’re in the money. At first the Haskell family kept DeTomaso away from the family coffers but eventually they couldn’t resist getting into the car business, their money coming in at about the time of the Mangusta program.
Next week, Part II.






Kia Australia has a range of






{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }
You state “but DeTomaso’s in-laws were what you call “connected” with American legislators. (We would say “in bed with” but don’t want to risk mis-interpretation through double entendres) DeTomaso squeaked the Mangusta through for U.S. sale by having it exempted as a low volume car, of which less than 500 would be made and only through 1969 in its original form”
In fact the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards specifically allow non conforming vehicle manufacture UP TO 500 copies as long as the Fed is apprised of the non conforming sections. There was no `funny stuff’.
No Mangustas ever had rocker switches ,save the left and right rocker switches for the electric windows.
More opinion and vitriol than fact in this article; not up to Veloce Today’s standards. And in fact the 500 car exemption from safety regulations applied to all imported models made to Dec. 31, 1969. I know; I was deeply involved with a Morgan at that time.
The following comment is from reader Dick Irish who needs no introduction to these pages. We edited Dick’s email down to a reasonable length and posted it.
Loved the Mangusta bit. Mind of I indulge in a couple of comments?
First of all I never knew of Isabelle’s W. Crapo Durant connection. I knew she was from Red Bank, N.J., her brother drove a 300SL and she had GREAT… oh, never mind! I thought a lot of her and really enjoyed our Sebring stint!. Haven’t seen her since one noon at Papa Cantoni’s ristorante in Modena when I was picking up my Ferrari 275 GTB/4.
While at the ‘67 Turin auto show I got my first good look at the Mangusta and had a nice chat with Alejandro. Never forgot his comment, “Dick(he says) What is wrong with you people? You make us put lights on the car to show where the lights were before you hid the lights!” He referred in particular to that “W” grilled Buick with the lights in the grill and hidden from the side by the leading edge of the front fenders!
When Toly Arutunoff and I were back for the ‘68 Turin show, Isabelle and Alejandro had left word for them to let us “test drive” a Mangusta. Toly had a “go” first and when he got back I had my chance. As we left the “works” the test driver looked at me and said, “You don’t remember me?” I told him I was sorry but I did not and he replied, “Last year I worked for Scaglietti; I put the roll bar in your car.” I gathered the car was squirrely because ever time he’d look down the road and see a damp spot (there bad been a few showers), he would lean up and point ahead saying “Wet! Wet!” so I’d ease off. He directed me over to the Autostrada and I asked him how high I could rev it as it was a brand new car with new engine and the tach was red-lined at 6,500 as I recall. His reply was “6,700″! When he verified this, I thought to myself, “Only in Italy!” On the Autostrada I was impressed as we hit the 6,700 in 5th in what seemed like nothing flat and had to lift a tad. We were approaching a tunnel when two Fiat 500’s pulled out nose to tail to pass a couple of slower trucks while we were going full chat. I flashed the headlamps as I jumped HARD on the binders and grabbed 4th, then third and second. It was sort of hilarious because as we bore down on the trailing Fiat I could see this driver’s eyes like tea cups in the mirror as he knew he’d committed a cardinal sin in Italy! We literally got anchored just a matter of feet off the rear guy’s back bumper as they were pedaling for all they were worth. The test driver exhaled and gave forth a, “Va bene!” That compliment made my whole darned day!
I actually had a twinge about selling the 4-cam for the “convenience” of a Ford in the DeTomaso. Fortunately I did not succumb. I still did not know how reliable that 4-cam would be as I only had about 35,000 miles on it that first year.
Thanks for “the ear”!
Dick Irish
Wally Wally Wally!
You say the Mangusta has it’s problems, and then you say literally nothing about the car….yet loads on it’s predecessor and it’s follow on model…..
While the car had “issues” that all Italian cars of the era had, lousy rubber anything…be it belts or hoses, built in paint issues in many cases…and it had a poor weight bias…..(hey! it’s a GT car, not a race car!) , the car really is a very sound piece once you get the things updated that should be updated! (Certainly if you haul one of these out of a barn somewhere and attempt to put it back on the road!) Rubber bits, hydraulic hoses/cylinders, discharged gas shocks, power window gears, and tires basically!
I believe these cars suffered more at the hands of incompetent mechanics than anything else. Due to it’s “Heinz 57″ combination of parts used to build it, service parts are remarkably easy to come by even today! When sound mechanics and parts are applied to these cars, they run very nicely and are extremely well mannered out on the roads! Very comfortable ‘at speed”, but then I’m only about 5′8″. Much taller than this, and you are looking at having to drop the floor pans, or adapt an unusual posture while motorvating down the road!
Wally, I expected a much better article about the CAR, not the man and his wife’s adventures……you’ve seen enough of them….perhaps you need to drive one!??? See you at the next US DeTomaso love-in 2011????
Steve
PS: Yes the AC unit is also under powered….but rotary compressors are cheap these days….and add more squirrels in the fan cage area!
Yes, a bit more about the car itself would have been nice, but was fun to hear the gossip part of ‘the story’.
I’d (almost) die to have a Mangusta. In the 60’s I was at Caldwell Tires in Pasadena having tires installed on my 750 Double Bubble when a fellow drove in with a brand new Mangusta. He was kind enough to lift the rear panel so I could see the engine and transaxle. I was smitten with it.
I’ve heard horror stories of 50’s and 60’s Italian ’supercars’ and what was found under the paint when they were being restored. You want Germans to build Italian thoroughbreds? Oh yeah, forget I said that.
Since I restore Alfa’s, mostly older Spiders, my take is, “So the Mangusta needed a little more sorting out…what’s new.”
At the heart of the Mangusta’s problems was the backbone (not ’spine’) frame. This was just way too weak in torsion to be subjected to the stresses of a powerful car like the Mangusta. Colin Chapman found this out with his use of the same concept for his Lotus 30.
But is it ever gorgeous! I love the gullwing openings over the engine.
What about the transaxles being damaged going over railroad tracks? No one remembers that problem.
Hello from Spain..
how exactly does the chassis work? are the rear suspensions connected directly to the engine? (engine acting as part of the chassis) I think this could be a first for a production car…
Wally,
Love the article even if it’s a bit sensational beyond the practical. In other words, written like an Italian car is built!
The Mangusta, along with the Pantera and various other Italian cars of the late ’60s to early ’70s, has some of the most stylish Campagnolo alloy wheels ever put on an automobile–modern designs leave me pretty lukewarm by comparison. Walking around Concorso in Monterey I overheard more than one admirer saying something about the, “Campy mags on that Lambo,” or the like. To the best of my knowledge, Campagnolo never made magnesium wheels; they’re actually Ergal, a brand name high-strength aluminum alloy incorporating 4% copper (among other alloying agents) that aids forging as well as fracture toughness–an important property, safety-wise, in auto wheels. The same alloy was used in Campagnolo bicycle components from that period, including the iconic Nuovo/Super Record gruppos.
Campagnolos were made from a magnesium alloy called Elektron, they made wheels for many European cars, from Ferrari and Lamborghini to Volkswagen, and even some Japanese cars, such as Datsun 240Z! FAZA was the exclusive importer for many years, and last I heard, Al Cosentino still had NOS Campagnolo wheels for many European cars. They are really beautiful and considered “ultralight” in wheel parlance.
This article is in error about the DeT 351 (later Pantera) scale models shown to Ford–there were three of them, not five. And the “long-nose” Iso Grifo was done after Giugiaro had left Bertone (and Ghia, too, for that matter).
To Medved: It sould be,”…of which ‘fewer’ (not ‘less’) would be made….”
Well,here in Italy,De Tomaso cars never got high ratings overall talking.
This was mainly due to their USA engines… that was the only way to go if you had to power a big Gt car chassis though :those big Ford and Chevy blocks provided decent performance along with trucklike reliability at an affordable cost.
But,this said,Alejandro’s cars were true beauties and the Mangusta,when seen cruising through our towns did overshadow every other contemporary sportcar.
Alas,as a bad all italian habit we were used to, back then,customers felt as having been scheduled as post production factory-testers by GT cars producers (all included to be honest).
Nontheless,notwithstanding the absence of noble mechanics,DeTomaso cuties had just the same amount of downlights as their challengers on the market,most of them coming from a poor (if ever done) testing time before rolling out the factory’s gates and from the hand made job which needed,again, a longer and more accurate check up by the tech.staff.
On my humble op. there’s actually one massive weak point,objectively coming from the project itself: the short wheelbase made the car pretty nervous on the wet.At least that’s what I was told in several GTcars shops where I had my 911s serviced:regrettably I have no personal experience. Today,a different set up in the rear axle supported by a far better tyre’s grip could reduce the problem…not so sure they could be able to successfully fix it in those years.
Speaking as a Mangusta owner and a mechanical engineer, the spine chassis may have issues, but the far greater problem is with the tube chassis from the firewall back. The original P70 racing chassis hard bolted the engine/transaxle to the spine chassis and mounted the suspension on the engine/transaxle. Contrary to what many of the books state, the road cars were completely different, using a frame of square tubing welded to the spine and extending backward to mount the engine/transaxle and suspension. This frame is often described as a “space frame”, but is nothing of the sort. It is more of a parallel tube frame consisting of 4 rectangular longitudinal tubes of the relatively wimpy size used in those days (look at the tubing used in a modern rear engine Ferrari and you will see what I mean). The upper and lower tubes on each side are triangulated to each other more or less reasonably with round tubing, but the two sides are connected only by a rear cross member at the bottom and a bolted in cross member at the top. The result is a flexible flyer chassis lacking stiffness and prone to cracking. One can just imagine deTomaso telling Dallara: “No you can’t redesign it, just finish it up the way it is so we can sell some cars”. Later Mangustas have strenghening fillet plates welded into the frame, a change which helped but really didn’t solve the basic problem.
From: Dick Ruzzin
This comment found on the internet , with sound references disputes Wally’s comedy routine. It is apparent that articles like Wally’s perpetuate the myth with
a lack of real factual information. Media is responsible for most of the erroneous “facts’ about the mangusta.
Dick Ruzzin / junkinthetrunk
_________________________________________________________
April 29, 2010 at 8:17 pm 0 or Flag comment
I’ve said this before somewhere else, …. but i’ll say it again.
Go read the 3 part series (stage 1, 2 , & 3) in 1969 Sports Car Graphic Mag. (you can find copies at Mangusta International ‘ s website). The main problem was the standard issue tires.
But besides this , on the same website (or if you have it in your library ) read the Nov. , 1969 Road & Track article – “Around and around we go to find out about CORNERING POWER” (starting on pg. 24).
9 cars were compared on a skid pad :
Lola / Ford Group 7
Detomaso Mangusta
Corvette 427
Porsche 911T
Lotus Elan S4
Dodge Charger 426
Alfa Berlina 1750
Chevrolet Impala
Austin America
And guess which came in 2nd best ?
The Mangusta
And that was with the stock tires – sporting the WORST tire contact patch area of them all, AND the six from the best in tire width !
Granted there were some pigs out there but it beat the Porsche & the Lotus !
Imagine the differance with modern tires and some suspension work.
Even in 1969 , with changing to Goodyear polyglass 60’s – Sports Car Graphic got one to handle great (again read that 3 part series).
Bad handling – just a bunch of incorrect ‘lore’ , handed down mouth to mouth (and in print) from some original unexperianced magazine testers opinions . Testing on the stock tires & badly set up original suspension settings.
Granted in earlier April 1969 Road & Track in their road test said “Tricky Handling” . But again stock tires and suspension setting’s AND they were comparing it to a Muira’s handling.
There is other Mangusta information passed down over time that even most Mangusta people don’t know. It was just initial Detomaso plans that were never actually followed through with. Just magazine writers rewriting wrong info. again & again over the years , and people believing what is in magazine print.
People like Wally Weiss.
Funny story involving a Ferrari 275GTB/C and a Mangusta. I was the President of Peter Gregg’s MB+BMW dealerships in the 1970s. My friend Pete Stanford was a contractor in Atlanta had a 275GTB/C, #9041 if you care, but wanted to go racing and had bought a Mangusta and was convinced that because it was a mid-engined car it had a BIG advantge over those silly rear engined RSR Porsches. He needed the money to develope the Mangusta so sold me his 275 and ploughed the money into the Mangusta for IMSA GT racing around about 1975 or so? I warned him that he could buy an RSR from us(Brumos)for I think around $40K with spares and that every proven race part was available over the parts counter! No way he said and proceeded to try to race the Mangusta and over the next two years broke every un- proven miserable part on the Mangusta and as I reacall never finished a race and finally broke and tired dumped the car for peanuts! Today the 275 which of course I sold too soon around the late ’80s is worth maybe $3.5M and the Mangusta maybe a $100K and the RSR if he had taken my advice is worth maybe $250-30oK
I drove the Mangusta a few times in testing and it was awful, slow and didn’t handle with too much rear weight and not enough brakes! Tom Claridge